In an Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) action alleging that defendant-school district failed to formulate an individualized education program (IEP) for plaintiff's daughter for a particular semester, a ruling finding that no compensatory educational services should be awarded as a matter of equity is affirmed where there was no abuse of discretion in the ruling, which acknowledged the district's procedural deficiency, but found that the award sought was unwarranted because the daughter had dropped out of school, demonstrated an unwillingness to return to school, and could essentially receive the very services she sought simply by reenrolling in school.