GORDON v. NORTON, 01-8102
Where a Tucker Act remedy was available, the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiffs' takings claims. Endangered Species Act claims are not yet ripe for review.
- Decided 02/25/2003
- Published 02/25/2003
MURPHY, Circuit Judge., Before MURPHY, ANDERSON, and O'BRIEN, Circuit Judges.
United States Tenth Circuit
John C. Martin, Patton Boggs LLP, Washington, D.C., (Susan M. Mathiascheck, Alexandra V. Butler, Patton Boggs LLP, Washington, D.C.; Richard E. Day, Williams, Porter, Day & Neville, Casper, WY, with him on the briefs), for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Katherine J. Barton, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., (Margot Zallen, Of Counsel, U.S. Department of the Interior, Denver, CO; Thomas L. Sansonetti, Assistant Attorney General, Washington, D.C.; David C. Shilton, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., with her on the brief), for Defendants-Appellees.