Supreme Court of Delaware
Dentson v. State of Delaware, 356, 2006
Judgment is affirmed on the basis of the well-reasoned decision concluding that appellant's second motion for post-conviction relief was both time-barred and repetitive and that appellant had failed to overcome these procedural hurdles.
Appellate Information
- Decided 10/02/2006
- Published 10/05/2006
Judges
Court
- Supreme Court of Delaware