FindLaw

 

Supreme Court of Delaware

ResetAA Font size: Print

Dentson v. State of Delaware, 356, 2006

Read Dentson v. State of Delaware, 356, 2006
READ

Judgment is affirmed on the basis of the well-reasoned decision concluding that appellant's second motion for post-conviction relief was both time-barred and repetitive and that appellant had failed to overcome these procedural hurdles.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 10/02/2006
  • Published 10/05/2006

Court

  • Supreme Court of Delaware

Counsel

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More