Venhaus v. Shultz, A116433
In an action raising a claim for negligent interference with prospective economic relations, judgment for defendant is reversed where the trial court prejudicially erred in the manner in which it modified a critical instruction.
- Decided 09/28/2007
- Published 09/28/2007
California Court of Appeal
Charles G. Kinney, Oakland, CA, for plaintiff and appellant.
David S. Stromberg, Walnut Creek, CA, for defendant and respondent.