| Description | Date | Docket # |
| IN RE MADISON GUAR. SAV. & LOAN (LARRY FEE APPLICATION) United States DC Circuit Attorney's Fees, Ethics & Professional Responsibility, Government Law |
02/27/2004 | 94-1 |
| GLASCOE v. US United States DC Circuit Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing Imprisonment for life supplies no fixed term from which to deduct institutional good time credits; one cannot calculate the maximum term of a life... |
02/27/2004 | 02-7063 |
| US v. HEARD United States DC Circuit Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing District court did not err in deciding to run defendant's new sentence consecutively to his old one. U.S.S.G. section 5G1.3(b)'s requirement of... |
02/27/2004 | 03-3043 |
| IN RE TENNANT United States DC Circuit Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Communications Law, Environmental Law Plaintiff's petition, concerning a cellphone tower erected in alleged violation of section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, is... |
02/24/2004 | 02-1060 |
| NORTHEAST MARYLAND WASTE DISPOSAL AUTH. v. EPA United States DC Circuit Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Communications Law, Environmental Law Environmental Law |
02/24/2004 | 01-1053, 01-1054, 01-1055, 02-1280, 02-1299, 03-1093 |
| BULLCREEK v. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMM'N United States DC Circuit Administrative Law, Environmental Law Section 10155(h) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act does not repeal or supersede defendant's authority under the Atomic Energy Act to license the storage... |
02/24/2004 | 03-1018, 03-1022 |
| GRAHAM v. ASHCROFT United States DC Circuit Administrative Law, Labor & Employment Law The Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA) precludes judicial review of plaintiff's claim that the FBI violated its own regulations in taking personnel... |
02/24/2004 | 03-5025 |
| US v. WILLIAMS United States DC Circuit Criminal Law & Procedure, Evidence, Sentencing The apprehending officers should not have been allowed to testify as to statements made by non-testifying complaining witnesses; remanded for a... |
02/24/2004 | 03-3006 |
| SEC'Y OF LABOR v. OHIO VALLEY COAL CO. United States DC Circuit Labor & Employment Law Citation was properly issued against the employer of a miner fatally injured by moving machinery while assessing necessary maintenance and repairs. 30... |
02/24/2004 | 03-1070 |
| WILLISTON BASIN INTERSTATE PIPELINE CO. v. FERC United States DC Circuit Administrative Law, Oil and Gas Law Defendant failed to provide an adequate explanation for its ruling, pursuant to section 5 of the Natural Gas Act, that plaintiff's practice of... |
02/20/2004 | 02-1257 |