| Description | Date | Docket # |
| THE STATE OF TEXAS v. GARZA Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas Criminal Law & Procedure Because the hearing on his motion to suppress and the jury trial were conducted in a unitary proceeding, defendant correctly preserved error by... |
01/28/2004 | 1691-02 |
| THE STATE OF TEXAS v. GARCIA Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing On direct appeal from his conviction of murdering a police officer and the resulting death sentence, defendant unavailingly raises seven points of... |
01/21/2004 | 74,294 |
| DE LEON v. AGUILAR Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas Civil Procedure, Criminal Law & Procedure The law provides an immediate remedy to enforce a right to recuse a biased trial judge; when a recusal motion is timely filed, Texas Rule of Civil... |
01/21/2004 | 74,760 |
| STATE OF TEXAS v. BALLARD Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas Criminal Law & Procedure The due diligence requirement does not apply when the capias is issued and the defendant apprehended within the community supervision period. |
01/14/2004 | 1683-02, 1684-02 |
| STATE OF TEXAS v. PAREDES Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing On appeal from his conviction of capital murder and death sentence, defendant unavailingly raises 29 points of error. |
01/14/2004 | 74,293 |
| STATE OF TEXAS v. WHITAKER Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas Criminal Law & Procedure The trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion for forensic DNA testing. Regardless of whose blood is on the rifle, other evidence at trial... |
01/14/2004 | 74,612 |