FindLaw

California Court of Appeal - November 2001 Opinion Summaries

  FILL IN AT LEAST ONE FIELD    
Court: Docket Number:
Legal Topic: Party Name:
Industry: Date:
Date Range: to
Format is YYYYMMDD
Enter Keywords or text: [options]
Description Date Docket #
WALKER v. KIOUSIS
California Court of Appeal
Injury & Tort Law 
Civil Code section 47.5, which allows a peace officer to bring a defamation action against an individual who knowingly and maliciously files a false... 		11/28/2001 E029822
BREWER v. FEDERICI
California Court of Appeal
Family Law 
Under Family Code section 2122, disclosure of a substantial community property asset's value as "unknown" will justify setting aside a stipulated or... 		11/28/2001 B135155
VAHLE v. BARWICK
California Court of Appeal
Professional Malpractice 
General release in personal injury case that releases "all other persons" does not, for summary judgment purposes, release the plaintiff's counsel... 		11/27/2001 A093671
PROVENZANO v. DEP'T OF MOTOR VEHICLES
California Court of Appeal
Antitrust & Trade Regulation 
Vehicle Code 11705(a)(14) applies to car salespersons in addition to manufacturers, transporters and dealers and allows the DMV to revoke a car... 		11/27/2001 D036898
COASTAL BERRY CO. v. AGRICULTURAL LABOR RELATIONS BD.
California Court of Appeal
Labor & Employment Law 
Strike misconduct is "serious" and justifying dismissal or denial of reinstatement of employees if "it reasonably tends to coerce or intimidate"... 		11/27/2001 H021585
PEOPLE v. RANGER INS. CO.
California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure 
Penal Code section 1166 does not apply to bond forfeiture cases that were resolved by plea agreement. 		11/26/2001 B145348
PEOPLE v. VIRAMONTES
California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure 
In murder case where there was conflicting testimony on who fired first, defendant's entitlement to perfect self-defense jury instruction did not... 		11/26/2001 B143288
PEOPLE v. SIMMONS
California Court of Appeal
Criminal Law & Procedure 
Proposition 21, Welfare and Institutions Code section 707(d), does not violate the single subject rule, the separation of powers doctrine, or... 		11/26/2001 C036269
PEOPLE v. DANG
California Court of Appeal
Evidence 
Evidence Code 956.5, which governs attorney-client privilege, does not apply to defendant who threatens witnesses in presence of his counsel. 		11/26/2001 B145393
NAM TAI ELECS., INC. v. TITZER
California Court of Appeal
Civil Procedure, Cyberspace Law 
Out-of-state defendant's posting on message board, whose servers were administered in state of California, is not sufficient to convey personal... 		11/26/2001 B149382

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More