STATE ULLMANN v. JOBSOHIO

ResetAA Font size: Print

Supreme Court of Ohio.

The STATE ex rel. ULLMANN v. JOBSOHIO et al.

No. 2013–1268.

-- December 03, 2013

Victoria E. Ullmann, pro se. Squire Sanders, L.L.P., and Aneca E. Lasley; and Organ, Cole & Stock, L.L.P., and Douglas R. Cole, for respondents JobsOhio and John Minor.

{¶ 1} This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus.

{¶ 2} Upon consideration of respondents' motion to dismiss, it is ordered by the court that the motion to dismiss is granted because JobsOhio is specifically exempted from the requirements of R.C. 149.43 by R.C. 187.04(C)(1). Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

O'CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O'NEILL, JJ., concur.O'DONNELL, J., not participating.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More