THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS




Orders Pronounced June 1, 2000






ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR REVIEW


THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ARE DENIED:

00-0196 IN THE MATTER OF H. B., R. L. O., and B. S.; from Smith County; 12th district (12-98-00117-CV, RULE 47.7, 01-31-00)

00-0300 JOHNNY HOLDER v. KELLER INDUSTRIES, INC. and HOME DEPOT, USA, INC.; from Dallas County; 5th district (05-97-01168-CV, RULE 47.7, 02-09-00)

00-0310 DARRYL KENT GRUSENDORF v. BARBARA LYNN GRUSENDORF; from Tarrant County; 2nd district (02-98-00397-CV, RULE 47.7, 12-23-99)

00-0315 M. R. MIKKILINENI and TALASILA (a dissolved Texas partnership) v. CITY OF HOUSTON, DENNIS LLOYD, RUSSELL MAI, PHILIP BARNARD, and GARY ORADAT; from Harris County; 1st district (01-98-01029-CV, 4 SW3d 298, 07-22-99)

00-0342 MARILYN MARSHALL v. PAUL QUINN COLLEGE; from Dallas County; 5th district (05-97-01939-CV, RULE 47.7, 01-18-00)

00-0352 MARTHA ROSALIE SCHEFFER v. ALLIED ASSETS CORPORATION, and ALLIED ASSETS CORPORATION d/b/a ARCOT MANUFACTURING CORPORATION; from Harris County; 1st district (01-99-00956-CV, RULE 47.7, 02-03-00)





THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ARE STRUCK PURSUANT TO

TEXAS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, 9.4(i):

00-0396 NEELY LANIER BLACKMAN, SR. v. EDWIN JOE FIELDS and W. B. CONTAINER SERVICES, INC.; from Dallas County; 5th district (05-97-01362-CV, RULE 47.7, 12-09-99)

The Court strikes the petition for review with the following notation: "The petition violates Tex. R. App. P. 53.2(c), 53.2(k) and is struck. Petitioner is ordered to redraw; the redrawn petition is due to be filed no later than 5:00 p.m. on June 15, 2000. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(i), 53.2(c), and 53.2(k)."

00-0526 DAVID EVERITT, TENNIE EVERITT, ERNEST MURPHY and PRACTICE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. v. TRANSPORTATION INSURANCE COMPANY; from Bexar County; 4th district (04-99-00657-CV, RULE 47.7, 03-22-00)

The Court strikes the petition for reveiw with the following notation: "The petition violates Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(e) and is struck. Petitioner is ordered to redraw; the redrawn petition is due to be filed no later than 5:00 p.m. on June 15, 2000. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(e), 9.4(i)."



ORDERS ON MOTIONS

THE FOLLOWING MOTIONS FOR REHEARING OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

ARE OVERRULED:


99-0924 NATIONAL LAND TITLE CO., INC. d/b/a SAFECO LAND TITLE CO. and EBBY HALLIDAY REAL ESTATE, INC. v. CLARKE NEWMAN and RHONDA NEWMAN; from Dallas County; 8th district (08-97-00637-CV, RULE 47.7, 04-26-99)

2 motions

(Justice Enoch not sitting)

99-0951 TYLER CAR & TRUCK CENTER v. EMPIRE FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY and EMPIRE INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY; from Smith County; 12th district (12-98-00234-CV, 2 SW3d 482, 07-30-99)

00-0099 TOMMIE J. DENSON v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE-INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, ET AL.; from Anderson County; 12th district (12-99-00177-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 10-28-99)

00-0108 DONALD C. JACKSON v. TEXAS EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION and JOHN BLUDWORTH MARINE, INC.; from Harris County; 14th district (14-98-01172-CV, RULE 47.7, 11-04-99)

MISCELLANEOUS

THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS ARE DENIED:

00-0424 IN RE OSCAR A. BUCK, guardian of LILLIAN M. BUCK, an incapacitated person

as corrected

00-0428 IN RE HERBERT FEIST

00-0504 IN RE CYNTHIA TRAVIS

motion for temporary relief overruled

00-0522 IN RE H. E. BUTT GROCERY COMPANY

motion for immediate temporary relief, as supplemented, overruled













THE FOLLOWING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION

FOR REVIEW IS OVERRULED:

00-0416 PAMALEE CHAMBERS v. MARK Z. LEVBARG; from Travis County; 3rd district (03-98-00138-CV, RULE 47.7, 09-17-99)

motion for ninety (90) day extension of time to file petition for review; alternatively, remand to the court of appeals on motion for rehearing filed March 31, 2000 for consideration of misconceptions and issues not addressed by the appeals court certificate of conference overruled

With the following notation: "See Tex. R. App. P. 53.7(f)."

THE MOTION FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF IS GRANTED IN THE

FOLLOWING CASE:

00-0519 IN RE KAREN ELIZABETH SHRADER

stay order issued

stay order and Relator's release conditioned upon $500.00 bond

response requested by 5:00 p.m., June 2, 2000

[NOTE: The petition for writ of habeas corpus remains pending before this Court.]

(Order delivered May 26, 2000)






THE MOTION TO STAY ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS IS GRANTED

IN THE FOLLOWING CASE:

00-0538 IN RE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PROTECTIVE AND REGULATORY SERVICES

stay order issued

response requested by 5:00 p.m., June 13, 2000

[NOTE: The petition for writ of mandamus remains pending before this Court.]

(Order delivered May 30, 2000)