THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS



Orders Pronounced March 22, 2001



ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR REVIEW


THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ARE DENIED:

00-1217 DEBORAH KLINE v. ALFA ROMEO DISTRIBUTORS OF NORTH AMERICA, INC. and MOTOR IMPORTS, INC.; from Bexar County; 4th district (04-00-00508-CV, RULE 47.7, 08-16-00)

01-0001 NEELY LANIER BLACKMAN SR. and MATTIE B. BLACKMAN v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS and JPI TEXAS DEVELOPMENT, INC.; from Dallas County; 5th district (05-98-00953-CV, RULE 47.7, 08-31-00)

motion to dismiss denied

01-0050 NANCY and AHAD ATABALA v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., and LARK BLUM; from Harris County; 1st district (01-00-00065-CV, RULE 47.7, 11-02-00)

01-0052 BOBBY HELPINSTILL v. REGIONS BANK, successor in interest to and formerly known as LONGVIEW NATIONAL BANK; from Gregg County; 6th district (06-99-00070-CV, 33 SW3d 401, 11-15-00)

01-0097 J. A. BREITHAUPT v. JAMES BAGNALL, COUNTY JUDGE, BETTY ARMSTRONG, OLIN NICKLEBERRY, WILLIAM BALDWIN, PAUL SLAUGHTER, and NAVARRO COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT; from Navarro County; 10th district (10-99-00354-CV, RULE 47.7, 12-20-00)

 

 


THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ARE DISMISSED

PURSUANT TO SETTLEMENT:

00-0926 CITY OF DALLAS and CITY OF FORT WORTH v. GRAMEX CORPORATION; from Dallas County; 5th district (05-97-01341-CV, RULE 47.7, 04-18-00)

abatement order of February 8, 2001, lifted

motion to dismiss granted

01-0072 HISAW & ASSOCIATES GENERAL CONTRACTORS, INC. and RICHARD HISAW v. CRAWFORD ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO.; from Dallas County; 8th district (08-99-00219-CV, RULE 47.7, 11-22-00)

motion to dismiss granted



 

 

THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR REVIEW IS ABATED

PURSUANT TO BANKRUPTCY:

00-1277 G.A.F. CORPORATION v. JOHN I. BAMBER, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, HAROLD O. DANIELS, ET AL.; from Jefferson County; 9th district (09-00-00153-CV, 29 SW3d 650, 10-26-00)

The Court abates this proceeding because of the bankruptcy filing by the petitioner. The petition for review is removed from the Court's active docket; it will be reinstated only upon proper motion. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.2, 8.3.

 

 

 

ORDERS ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING



THE FOLLOWING MOTIONS FOR REHEARING OF PETITIONS FOR

REVIEW ARE DENIED:

00-0400 CITY OF EAGLE PASS/TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE WORKERS' COMPENSATION JOINT INSURANCE FUND, and CAPITAL METRO TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY/TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE WORKERS' COMPENSATION JOINT INSURANCE FUND v. TEXAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION; from Travis County; 3rd district (03-99-00406-CV, 14 SW3d 801, 03-09-00)



00-1224 HERIBERTO URRUTIA and EFRAIN PEREZ v. KYSOR INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION; from Harris County; 14th district (14-98-00577-CV, RULE 47.7, 09-14-00)

 

 

 

 

THE FOLLOWING MOTIONS FOR REHEARING OF PETITIONS FOR

WRIT OF MANDAMUS ARE DENIED:

00-1147 IN RE RYAN-O EXCAVATING, INC. and UNIVERSAL SURETY OF AMERICA

00-1282 IN RE CLOWERS FREIGHT MANAGEMENT, INC. d/b/a R & R TRANSPORTATION SERVICES OF TEXAS, INC.

 

 

MISCELLANEOUS

THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS IS STRUCK

PURSUANT TO TEXAS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, 9.4(i):

01-0227 IN RE TENET HEALTHSYSTEM HOSPITALS DALLAS, INC., TENET HEALTHSYSTEMS HOSPITALS DALLAS, INC. d/b/a TRINITY MEDICAL CENTER, TRINITY MEDICAL CENTER, TENET HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, TENET HEALTHSYSTEM HOSPITALS, INC.

The Court strikes the petition for writ of mandamus with the following notation: "The petition violates Tex. R. App. P. 52.6 and is struck. Relators are ordered to redraw; the redrawn petition is due to be filed no later than 5:00 p.m. on April 5, 2001. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(i) and 52.6."