U.S. Supreme Court Cases: Volume 212

Welcome to FindLaw's searchable database of U.S. Supreme Court decisions for Volume 212. Supreme Court opinions are browsable by year and U.S. Reports volume number, and are searchable by party name, case title, citation, full text and docket number. Published opinions in Volumes 1 through 557 are available. To access decisions published after June 2009 in Volumes 558 and higher, please either browse by calendar year or search by party name or full text. FindLaw maintains an archive of Supreme Court opinion summaries from September 2000 to the present. Summarized cases are browsable by date and searchable by docket number, case title, and full text.

Browse by Recent Decisions

Description Date Docket #
AMERICAN EXP CO v. U S,  212 U.S. 522 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 405
AMERICAN EXP CO v. MULLINS ,  212 U.S. 311 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 77
BAGLEY v. GENERAL FIRE EXTINGUISHER CO ,  212 U.S. 477 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 96
BILIK v. STRASSHEIM ,  212 U.S. 551 (1908) October 19, 1908 No. 445
BRADFORD v. MORRISON ,  212 U.S. 389 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 60
CARINO v. INSULAR GOVERNMENT OF PHILIPPINE ISLANDS ,  212 U.S. 449 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 72
CHICAGO & A R CO v. US ,  212 U.S. 563 (1909) January 4, 1909 No. 238
CITY OF KNOXVILLE v. KNOXVILLE WATER CO. ,  212 U.S. 1 (1909) January 4, 1909 No. 17
CLEVENGER v. CHANEY ,  212 U.S. 562 (1908) December 14, 1908 No. 221
CONTINENTAL WALL PAPER CO v. LOUIS VOIGHT & SONS CO ,  212 U.S. 227 (1909) February 1, 1909 No. 15
CONVERSE v. AETNA NAT BANK ,  212 U.S. 567 (1909) January 25, 1909 No. 75
CRAWFORD v. US ,  212 U.S. 183 (1909) February 1, 1909 No. 92
E C ATKINS & CO v. MOORE ,  212 U.S. 285 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 86
FREDERIC L. GRANT SHOE CO. v. W M LAIRD CO. ,  212 U.S. 445 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 35
FRITZLEN v. BOATMEN'S BANK ,  212 U.S. 364 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 99
GREENAMEYER v. COATE ,  212 U.S. 434 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 100
HAMMOND PACKING CO. v. STATE OF ARKANSAS ,  212 U.S. 322 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 54
HARTEN v. LOFFLER ,  212 U.S. 397 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 91
IN RE DUNN ,  212 U.S. 374 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 10
JAHN v. THE FOLMINA ,  212 U.S. 354 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 84
JOHNSON v. MUESER ,  212 U.S. 283 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 67
JURAGUA IRON CO v. US ,  212 U.S. 297 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 34
LAUREL OIL & GAS CO v. MORRISON ,  212 U.S. 291 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 198
LOUISVILLE & N R CO v. CENTRAL STOCK YARDS CO ,  212 U.S. 132 (1909) January 25, 1909 No. 51
MCCARTHY v. BUNKER HILL & SULLIVAN MINING & CONCENTRATING C ,  212 U.S. 569 (1909) February 1, 1909
MCDANIEL v. TRAYLOR ,  212 U.S. 428 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 70
MERCER v. MONITOR DRILL CO ,  212 U.S. 590 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 617
MOYER v. PEABODY ,  212 U.S. 78 (1909) January 18, 1909 No. 55
MULLAN v. US ,  212 U.S. 516 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 82
NEW YORK CENT & H R R CO v. US ,  212 U.S. 500 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 69
NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO. v. U. S. ,  212 U.S. 481 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 57
NIELSEN v. STATE OF OREGON ,  212 U.S. 315 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 593
NORTH SHORE BOOM & DRIVING CO v. NICOMEN BOOM CO ,  212 U.S. 406 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 107
ONTARIO LAND CO. v. YORDY ,  212 U.S. 152 (1909) February 1, 1909 No. 59
PALMER v. STATE OF TEXAS ,  212 U.S. 118 (1909) January 18, 1909 No. 224
PITTSBURGH, C C & S L R COMPANY v. LIGHTHEISER ,  212 U.S. 560 (1908) December 7, 1908 No. 141
PRESIDIO COUNTY v. NOEL-YOUNG BOND & STOCK CO ,  212 U.S. 58 (1909) January 18, 1909 No. 41
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF LOUISIANA v. CUMBERLAND TELEPHONE & ,  212 U.S. 414 (1906) August 6, 1906 No. 182
RAKES v. US ,  212 U.S. 55 (1909) January 18, 1909 No. 257
SANTOS v. HOLY ROMAN CATHOLIC AND APOSTOLIC CHURCH ,  212 U.S. 463 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 73
SPOKANE VALLEY LAND & WATER CO v. MADSON ,  212 U.S. 565 (1909) January 25, 1909 No. 202
SPRECKELS v. BROWN ,  212 U.S. 208 (1909) February 1, 1909 No. 61
STANDARD OIL CO v. ANDERSON ,  212 U.S. 215 (1909) February 1, 1909 No. 58
TEXAS & P R CO v. BOURMAN ,  212 U.S. 536 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 56
THE EUGENE F. MORAN v. NEW YORK CENTRAL & HUDSON RIVER R. CO. ,  212 U.S. 466 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 87
THOMAS v. STATE OF TEXAS ,  212 U.S. 278 (1909) February 23, 1909
TOY TOY v. HOPKINS ,  212 U.S. 542 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 49
US v. MARVIN ,  212 U.S. 275 (1909) February 1, 1909 No. 436
US v. NEW YORK CENT & H R R CO ,  212 U.S. 509 (1909) February 23, 1909 No. 285
VALDES v. MUNICH ,  212 U.S. 568 (1909) February 1, 1909 No. 457
WATERS-PIERCE OIL CO. v. DESELMS ,  212 U.S. 159 (1909) February 1, 1909 No. 62
WATERS-PIERCE OIL CO v. STATE OF TEXAS ,  212 U.S. 112 (1909) January 18, 1909 No. 360
WATERS-PIERCE OIL CO v. STATE OF TEXAS ,  212 U.S. 86 (1909) January 18, 1909 No. 359
WESTERN LOAN & SAVINGS CO v. COLORADO SMELTING & MINING ,  212 U.S. 556 (1908) November 16, 1908 No. 581
WILLCOX v. CONSOLIDATED GAS CO. OF NEW YORK ,  212 U.S. 19 (1909) January 4, 1909 No. 396
Browse opinions by volume »

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More